CHICAGO, Sept. 10, 2021 / PRNewswire / –
JUDICIAL LEGAL NOTICE
If you bought a chicken product in The United States from January 1, 2009, by December 31, 2020, You may be eligible for class litigation settlements totaling funds $ 181 million.
Para una notificacion in español, llame free al 1-877-888-5428 o Visit the Nuestro website www.overchargedforchicken.com.
Settlements were reached in an antitrust class action lawsuit filed on behalf of end-user-consumer plaintiffs with Defendants: Fieldale Farms Corporation (“Fieldale”); George’s Inc. and George’s Farms, Inc. (“George’s”); Mar-Jac Poultry, Inc., Mar-Jac Poultry MS, LLC, Mar-Jac Poultry AL, LLC, Mar-Jac AL / MS, Inc., Mar-Jac Poultry, LLC and Mar-Jac Holdings, Inc. (“March Jac“); Peco Foods, Inc. (” Peco “); Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation (” Pilgrim’s “); and Tyson Foods, Inc., Tyson Chicken, Inc., Tyson Breeders, Inc., and Tyson Poultry, Inc. (” Tyson “) (collectively” Defendant Settlement “). This court-ordered notice may affect your rights. Please read and follow instructions carefully.
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois authorizes this notice. Before any money is paid, the court will hold a hearing to determine whether the settlements will be approved.
Who is included?
For billing purposes, peer group members are any person or entity that has indirectly purchased fresh or frozen raw chicken (defined as whole birds (with or without giblets), whole cut birds purchased in a package, or “white meat”. ” Portions, including breasts and wings (or portions containing a combination thereof), but excluding chicken marketed as halal, kosher, free range, or organic) by defendants or alleged co-conspirators for personal consumption if the person or organization has purchased in California, District of Columbia, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, new York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island (after July 15, 2013), South carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, and Wisconsin from January 1, 2009 (except for Rhode Island, this is from July 15, 2013), to July 31, 2019, and for Pilgrim’s from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2020.
In addition to the Settlement Defendants, the other defendants in this lawsuit for the purposes of this notice include: Agricultural statistics, Inc. and Claxton Poultry Farms, Inc .; Foster Farms, LLC and Foster Poultry Farms; Harrison Poultry, Inc. and House of Raeford Farms, Inc .; JCG Foods of Alabama, LLC, JCG Foods of Georgia, LLC, Koch Foods, Inc. and Koch Meats Co., Inc .; Mountaire Farms, Inc., Mountaire Farms, LLC and Mountaire Farms of Delaware, Inc .; OK Foods, Inc., OK Farms, Inc., and OK Industries, Inc .; Perdue Farms, Inc. and Perdue Foods LLC; Sanderson Farms, Inc., Sanderson Farms, Inc. (Food Division), Sanderson Farms, Inc. (Processing Division), and Sanderson Farms, Inc. (Manufacturing Division); Wayne Farms, LLC; and Simmons Foods, Inc. and Simmons Prepared Foods, Inc. (collectively the “Unpaid Defendants”).
If you are unsure whether to attend, you can find more information, including a detailed note, at www.overchargedforchicken.com or by calling toll-free 1-877-888-5428.
What is this lawsuit about??
This class action, In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation (consumer lawsuit), ND Fig.Case No. 1: 16-cv-08637, is pending in The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. U.S. District Court Judge Thomas M. Durkin conducts this class action lawsuit.
Consumer plaintiffs allege that the defendants and their co-conspirators conspired to stabilize the price and supply of chicken January 1, 2009, in violation of federal and state consumer and antitrust laws. Defendants have recognized no liability in relation to the legal claims asserted in this lawsuit and continue to dispute them and would bring numerous defenses against plaintiffs’ claims if proceedings were continued against them. Nonetheless, the Defendants have agreed to settle this lawsuit in order to avoid the further costs, inconvenience, disruption, and burdens of this litigation and any other current or future litigation arising out of the facts that gave rise to this litigation in order to increase the risk Avoid dealing with uncertain complex litigation and legal proceedings, and thus resolve this controversy. The case is still ongoing on behalf of the end-user-consumer plaintiffs against the unresolved defendants who may be subject to separate settlements, judgments, or bulk certification orders.
What does the comparison offer?
Under the terms of the settlement agreements, the settlement defendants pay in total $ 181,000,000 to resolve any peer group claims against you and your affiliates. In addition to this financial benefit, the settlement defendants have also agreed to assist in the further prosecution of the dispute by the consumer plaintiffs (as set out in the settlement agreements). The Co-Lead Counsel may request that settlement funds be postponed if future settlements are reached with additional defendants. Settlement updates will be made available on the Settlement website at www.overchargedforchicken.com or by contacting the claims administrator.
A portion of the settlement proceeds was and will be used by the claims administrator for notification and administrative costs. In addition, the Co-Lead Counsel will request that the court award attorney’s fees and allow certain legal costs and expenses to be reimbursed. The request is made at least fourteen days before the deadline for objecting to the settlements and published on the website www.overchargedforchicken.com. Co-Lead Counsel will charge legal fees no more than 33.3% of the Settlement Fund or $ 60,273,000, and the total amount of the requested costs is no more than $ 8.75 million. Co-Lead Counsel will also receive service awards of up to. apply for $ 2,000 for each of the class representatives. Any settlement monies that remain after the court-ordered attorney’s fees, costs and legal costs have been paid will be proportionally distributed upon conclusion of the dispute or as ordered by the court.
What are your rights and options??
Submit a complaint online at www.overchargedforchicken.com from December 31, 2022. This time limit can be changed by the court and any extended time limit for claims will be published at www.overchargedforchicken.com. If you submit a timely request, you will automatically be eligible to participate in the distribution of any monies received on future settlements unless you object to such future settlements. You do not need to take any action to remain a member of the peer group and be bound by the settlement agreements. As a member of a comparison group, you may be able to participate in (or exclude yourself) any future settlement or judgment that end-user-consumer plaintiffs will receive against the unresolved defendants in this case.
If you don’t want to be bound by the settlement agreements, you need to self-exclude yourself November 10, 2021, or you will not be able to sue or continue to sue the Defendants or their affiliates over the Released Claims (as defined in the Settlement Agreements). If you self-isolate, you cannot get any money from the settlements. If you do not exclude yourself from the comparison group, you can still object to the settlement agreements up to November 10, 2021. The detailed note explains how you can contradict yourself or yourself. You can also find details on the FAQ page on the Settlement website. The court will hold a hearing in this case (In re: antitrust disputes in broiler chickens (consumer lawsuit), Case No. 1: 16-cv-08637 (ND Fig.)) December 20, 2021, at 9:00 in the morningto see if the settlement agreements should be approved. You can or do not have to ask to speak at the hearing.
This advice is only a summary. Further details on the settlements can be found at www.overchargedforchicken.com or by calling toll-free 1-877-888-5428. Please do not turn to the court.
Show original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/hagens-berman-sobol-shapiro-llp-and-cohen-milstein-sellers–toll-pllc-announce-a-181-million-settlement-for-consumers -who-chicken-products-bought-301373612.html
SOURCE Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP and Cohen Milstein seller & Toll, PLLC